Towards a tailor-made approach to the benchmarking and monitoring of the energy and climate policy of cities
KPMG | 2010
The whole world is facing a significant challenge of how to limit the effects of climate change. These days, there is little doubt that climate change is an important issue. Therefore, the main question now is how to address it. A noteworthy report with ideas and concepts.
Bernd Hendriksen, Director, Sustainability Advisory practice, KPMG in the Netherlands: “Addressing climate change is a shared responsibility requiring the joint support of citizens, businesses and governments. Cities occupy a crucial position in this respect. They house large populations and many businesses, generating a great deal of mobility, and are, therefore, significant emitters of greenhouse gases.
This also implies that cities have unique opportunities to develop an energy and climate policy to reduce these emissions significantly. To achieve this, cities can mobilise the parties involved, create awareness and enforce specific changes through legislation and regulations. The range of issues to be addressed is virtually endless, from waste collection and industrial policy to car use in the inner cities and grant schemes for green energy.
“Cities are responsible for about eighty per cent of the global energy consumption and half of the total greenhouse gas emissions (European Commission, 20081). Cities are, therefore, one of the key locations in the fight against global warming.”
Moreover, this also presents cities with opportunities: a city that successfully tackles this issue can raise its profile accordingly. In the near future, this will become an increasingly important way for cities to distinguish themselves.
Understandably, cities are already using the opportunities available to place the issue of climate change on a solid footing. Domestically as well as internationally, numerous initiatives and tools have been implemented to measure the efforts, benchmark and share knowledge.
In this publication, KPMG Sustainability analyses and compares the impact of various tools and initiatives. One of our conclusions is that the landscape is cluttered, showing little uniformity or cohesion. We also conclude that initiatives are often not correctly aligned to the specific characteristics of a given city and, therefore, do not invite a tailor-made approach. We have therefore made several suggestions for improvement. These are also based on the awareness that cities, particularly in the coming years, will require tailor-made policies that are designed to achieve optimal and sustainable results cost-effectively.
Furthermore, requirements will become stricter. The Covenant of Mayors (a European Commission initiative for commitment by signatory towns and cities to go beyond the objectives of EU energy policy in terms of reduction in CO2 emissions), for example, is drafting stricter requirements concerning reporting. The European Commission will also keep a close eye on the energy and climate policies of cities.”